We have a separate page for Ollama and small models — that's the $12 CPU box running 1B–8B and embeddings. This page is the other end: the models big enough that RAM, not the CPU, is what stops you.
Let's be honest up front, same as everywhere: our servers are CPU-only, no GPU. A large model here runs slowly. If you want fast interactive chat on a 30B model, you need a GPU host — different product, different provider. What a high-memory CPU box does well is run a big quantized model privately for work that isn't a chat window.
The RAM math
The model sits in memory, quantized or not, plus overhead for context and the runtime:
- 13B, 4-bit — roughly 10–16 GB. Runs on a mid plan already.
- 30B-class, quantized — 24–48 GB depending on quantization. This is Pro-32 to Pro-64 territory.
- Bigger or higher precision — 64–80 GB, and past 80 GB no single box of ours fits. Pro-80 is the ceiling here.
That's why "run a bigger local model" is really a high-memory question. The model is the memory footprint. Add a RAG index on the same host and the numbers stack.
Where private-first genuinely wins
The case isn't speed and it isn't cost — it's that some data can't leave. Legal documents. Medical records. Proprietary code. Anything where sending the prompt to a third-party API is off the table. A slower model that runs entirely on your machine beats a fast one that logs everything you send it. We wrote the full picture here.
And if the data is that sensitive, the payment probably should be private too. Renting the box with crypto and no KYC keeps the whole chain — server, model, prompts, billing — off anyone's identity records. That's the pitch: not cheaper inference, but inference nobody else can see.
What to pick
For a 30B-class model with room for context, Pro-64 (64 GB) is the comfortable choice; a tighter quantization fits Pro-32 or Pro-48, a larger one goes to Pro-80. Load the model first, watch resident memory, size from what you measured. And set expectations: this is private batch inference, not a fast chat window.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.